{"id":345,"date":"2010-04-01T12:48:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-01T12:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/2010\/04\/01\/cjp-said-the-law-ministry-is-not-interested-in-nro-verdict\/"},"modified":"2010-04-01T12:48:00","modified_gmt":"2010-04-01T12:48:00","slug":"cjp-said-the-law-ministry-is-not-interested-in-nro-verdict","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/lawyersmovement\/cjp-said-the-law-ministry-is-not-interested-in-nro-verdict\/","title":{"rendered":"CJP said The Law Ministry is not interested in NRO verdict."},"content":{"rendered":"

ISLAMABAD: Law Ministry functionaries are not interested in implementing the Supreme Court\u2019s verdict on the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO), Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said on Thursday. Meanwhile, the Law Secretary denied that Law Minister Babar Awan was creating obstructions in the way of reopening Swiss cases against President Asif Ali Zardari. \u201cI am surprised by the Attorney-General statements regarding the Law Minister,\u201d the Law Secretary said. Earlier, Attorney-General Pakistan Anwar Mansoor had informed the Supreme Court that the Law Minister was creating hurdles in reopening the cases.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"ISLAMABAD: Law Ministry functionaries are not interested in implementing the Supreme Court\u2019s verdict on the National Reconciliation Ordinance…\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-345","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-lawyersmovement","7":"cs-entry","8":"cs-video-wrap"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chiefjusticeblog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}